|

POMA wants The Journal of the Pennsylvania Osteopathic Medical Association to be a safe space for all DOs to have a voice and be heard. Opportunities to contribute in all content areas are open to all osteopathic medical students, residents and physicians. Share your thoughts, ideas and submissions via email to [email protected].
*Views expressed in The Journal of the Pennsylvania Osteopathic Medical Association are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editorial board, The JPOMA, or POMA unless specified.
|
Barriers to Achieving Health Literacy
February 2026 | Vol. 70, No. 1 By Angela Zawisza, DO, DMUCOM '07
“I don’t know how my parents would have managed this if I wasn’t a physician.”
This statement came from a colleague of mine, as we were discussing her father’s recent heart attack and my own father’s traumatic hemopneumothorax and subsequent hospitalizations. I echoed her sentiments, and my mind started down the rabbit hole of health care literacy in the United States.
The definition of health care literacy changed with the release of the US Government’s Healthy People 2030 initiative, compared to the Healthy People 2010 and 2020 definition. According to the newest initiative, health care literacy is defined as the following:
- “Personal health literacy is the degree to which individuals have the ability to find, understand, and use information and services to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others.
- Organizational health literacy is the degree to which organizations equitably enable individuals to find, understand, and use information and services to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others.”
The changes in the definition, according to the CDC, “emphasize people's ability to use health information rather than just understand it, focus on the ability to make ‘well-informed’ decisions rather than ‘appropriate’ ones, acknowledge that organizations have a responsibility to address health literacy, and incorporate a public health perspective.”
|
|
Read more...
|
|
A Dignified Death
October 2025 | Vol. 69, No. 3 Written by Melissa P. Broyles, DO
A typical Qliq message reads, “Routine Palliative Care consult to discuss goals of care with family. Patient is Sylvia S. in ICU 468.” The chart describes a somnolent 100-year-old woman with advanced dementia, admitted due to dehydration and subsequent acute-on-chronic kidney disease. When I speak with her daughter, I learn that Ms. Sylvia, fondly called so by her students, was a beloved kindergarten teacher for forty years and a devoted mother of four. Her daughter shares that she had poor oral intake for two weeks prior to admission and had stopped eating and drinking entirely in the last two days.
At Ms. Sylvia’s bedside, she lies in peaceful stillness—frail, beautiful, and unmoving. Her heart monitor blares repeatedly, alarming for a heart rate of forty-eight, yet she does not stir. Suddenly, behind me, a determined attending physician and medical resident rush into the room with a consent form and surgical tray in hand—not due to Ms. Sylvia’s heart rate, but because they are on a different mission. To my surprise, following a specialist’s suggestion, they intend to place an access line in her neck to initiate dialysis.
|
|
Read more...
|
Standing Firm: POMA's Commitment to Physician-Led Care
October 2025 | Vol. 69, No. 3 Written by George Wolters, DO, POMA President, and Tyler Burke, POMA Senior Director of Government Affairs
Opposition to granting independent licensure for advanced practice nurses is grounded in the realities and demands of family practice. Providing comprehensive medical care for all ages and all genders requires extensive training and experience, best delivered by a team directed by a physician. Multiple physician organizations have opposed expanded licensing efforts for decades.
Advocates for independent nurse practice claim there is no difference in outcomes between independent practice and physician-led, team-based care. Other studies contradict this claim by showing poorer outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, and higher costs associated with unsupervised nurse practice. Additionally, concerns over increased diagnostic X-ray use and overprescription of antibiotics and opioids reinforce questions of patient safety. An excellent commentary and overview, published in the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine (2024; 124(12): 555-558), is well worth the read.
In 2019, POMA and other key stakeholders began negotiations regarding the scope of practice for Certified Registered Nurse Practitioners (CRNPs) in Pennsylvania. After months of challenging and complex discussions, the parties reached an agreement on a pilot program. This program would be limited to primary care and Healthcare Practitioner Shortage Areas (HPSAs), a provision POMA believed would ensure CRNPs practiced in areas with true healthcare access needs, addressing the very gaps their advocacy claimed to target.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 Next > last >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |